This draft is definitely more in-depth than the previous drafts. There is more explanation of each article and parenthetical citation as needed for these explanations. Also, this draft contains a great deal more analysis of each source and identification of the rhetorical devices used by each writer. Now, it reads – I hope – more like a rhetorical analysis and less like a research paper.
Also, it was necessary to dig for the correct ways to cite my electronic sources – especially the interview. MLA is constantly updating itself; however, sometimes the updates answers how to cite the source in the bibliography and not in the paper itself, or visa versa. It’s all a bit tedious and time consuming, sometimes more than writing the paper itself.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment